Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient’s reasons for claims in different radiology modalities

From: Investigating errors in medical imaging: medical malpractice cases in Finland

Patient’s reasons for the claims

Delayed diagnosis

Incorrect or inadequate diagnosis

Incorrect or inadequate examination

Medical malpractice, accident

Medical malpractice, infection or complication

Delayed medical treatment

Total

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

Radiography

85

50.0

56

32.9

4

2.4

7

4.1

13

7.6

5

2.9

170

16.1

Computed tomography

27

26.2

18

17.5

8

7.8

3

2.9

38

36.9

9

8.7

103

9.8

Imaging

42

25.9

51

31.5

12

7.4

6

3.7

42

25.9

9

5.5

162

15.4

Ultrasound

27

43.5

15

24.2

11

17.7

0

0.0

8

12.9

1

1.6

62

5.9

Interventional radiologya

1

1.0

2

2.0

2

2.0

2

2.0

91

91.9

1

1.0

99

9.4

Mammography and screening mammography

218

69.4

35

11

27

8.6

7

2.2

26

8.3

1

0.3

314

29.8

Diagnostic and therapeutic vascular radiology

4

2.8

0

0.0

0

0.0

2

1.4

137

95.1

1

0.7

144

13.6

Total

404

38.3

177

16.8

64

6

27

2.6

355

33.7

27

2.6

1054

100

  1. aBiliary intervention, catheter placement, genitourinary, pain management, contrast-enhanced and fluoroscopy examinations