Table 2 Intermethod agreement for all combinations between the four tested methods
Intermethod agreement | ICC (95% CI) | Mean value, t test |
|---|---|---|
Jakob vs. Goutallier | 0.996 (0.994–0.998) | 30.1 vs. 24.1° (p < 0.001) MD: 5.9 ± 2.6° (range 0.3–12.7°) |
Jakob vs. 3D-TF | 0.783 (0.684–0.853) | 30.1 vs. 28.1° (p = 0.033) MD: 2.0 ± 8.5° (range − 23.5–24.6°) |
Jakob vs. 3D-T | 0.715 (0.481–0.834) | 30.1 vs. 25.2° (p < 0.001) MD: 4.9 ± 9.6° (range − 16.4–26.3°) |
Goutallier vs. 3D-TF | 0.795 (0.681–0.868) | 24.1 vs. 28.1 (p < 0.001) MD: − 3.9 ± 8.7° (range − 31.6–16.6°) |
Goutallier vs. 3D-T | 0.729 (0.581–0.825) | 24.1 vs. 25.2 (p = 0.348) − 1.0 ± 9.9° (range − 24.5–19.9°) |
3D-TF vs. 3D-T | 0.950 (0.860–0.977) | 28.1 vs. 25.2° (p < 0.001) MD: 2.9 ± 4.5° (range − 10.2–12.0°) |