Table 4 Directed feedback collected from students during the face-to-face optional course
From: Blended learning of radiology improves medical students’ performance, satisfaction, and engagement
Satisfaction survey | Promotion 1* | Promotion 2* | Promotion 3* | Total* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Format evaluation | ||||
Did this learning format encourage you to study? | 66 (97%) | 82 (93%) | 93 (90%) | 241 (93%) |
Was the preliminary work reasonable? | 51 (75%) | 82 (93%) | 89 (86%) | 222 (86%) |
Do you consider the platform suitable? | 43 (63%) | 81 (92%) | 92 (89%) | 225 (87%) |
VBL evaluation | ||||
Are the videos easily accessible? | 63 (93%) | 88 (100%) | 102 (99%) | 253 (98%) |
Are the videos clear? | 68 (100%) | 83 (94%) | 101 (98%) | 254 (98%) |
Are the videos adapted to your level of knowledge? | 65 (96%) | 84 (95%) | 100 (97%) | 249 (96%) |
Are the videos of an adapted duration? | 65 (96%) | 77 (88%) | 94 (91%) | 236 (91%) |
Did you like the format of the videos? | 62 (92%) | 86 (98%) | 101 (98%) | 249 (96%) |
Tests evaluation | ||||
Did you improve using this learning method? | 64 (94%) | 82 (93%) | 99 (96%) | 245 (95%) |
Did you review reference books? | 67 (99%) | 81 (92%) | 91 (88%) | 239 (92%) |
Did you have the opportunity to self-evaluate? | 57 (84%) | 77 (88%) | 86 (83%) | 220 (85%) |
Global satisfaction | ||||
Are you satisfied with this learning format? | 68 (100%) | 88 (100%) | 101 (98%) | 257 (99%) |
Perspective | ||||
Would you recommend this learning format to other medical imaging fields? | 66 (97%) | 87 (99%) | 103 (100%) | 256 (99%) |