Correction to: Advanced imaging in adult diffusely infiltrating low-grade gliomas

Insights into Imaging

Table 1 Radiomic data for differential diagnosis of low-grade vs high-grade gliomas

Parameters	Low-grade glioma	High-grade glioma	Cut of value^Ref (Range)^Ref
rCBV_max	Low	High	1.76 [10, 19] (0.94–3.34) [9,10,11, 19,20,21]
rCBV_MD	Low	High	1.44 [22] (1.08–1.81) [22]
nADC_min	High	Low	1.07 × 10⁻³ mm²/s [24] (0.31–1.31) [23,24,25,26,27,28]
Cho/Cr ratio	Low	High	1.56 [19] (1.3–2.04) [28,30,31]
MK_MD	Low	High	0.17 [28] (0.11–0.28) [28]
FA_TC	Low	High	0.3 [25] (0.14–0.63) [25]
MD_min	High	Low	0.98 mm²/s [25] (0.76–0.91) [25]
k_trans	Low	High	1.18 [22] (0.91–1.45) [22]
V_e	Low	High	1.43 [22] (1.06–1.80) [22]
ITTS grade	1.2	2.6	NA [9]
APT signal (%)	Low	High	2.23% [15] (1.53%–3.70%) [15]

rCBV_max maximum relative cerebral blood volume, rCBV_MD standardized mean difference of rCBV_max,nADC_min Normalized minimum apparent diffusion coefficient, Cho/Cr Choline/Creatine, MK_MD mean difference in mean kurtosis, FA_TC Odds ratio of fractional anisotropy in the tumor core, MD_min Minimum mean diffusivity, k_trans standardized mean difference of volume transfer coefficient, V_e standardized mean difference of volume fraction of extravascular extracellular space, ITTS Intratumoral susceptibility score, APT Percent amide proton transfer signal