Skip to main content

Table 1 Feedback Survey - Radiology Departments following contact via their National Radiological Society

From: The Current Status of Radiological Clinical Audit and Feedback on the ESR Guide to Clinical Audit in Radiology and the ESR Clinical Audit Tool (Esperanto) – an ESR Survey of European Radiology Departments

Q1YesNoNo - application in processI don't know       
Is your department a member of the ESR EuroSafe Imaging Stars network?6 (13.95%)28 (65.12%)1 (2.33%)8 (18.60%)       
Q2YesNo         
Are you familiar with the ESR publication - Esperanto 2019, the ESR Guide to Clinical Audit in Radiology and the ESR Clinical Audit Tool?24 (55.81%)19 (44.719%)         
Q3Word of mouth /colleaguesECR 2019ESR email /twitter / publicationNational radiology societyOther      
How did you hear about Esperanto 2019?6 (23.08%)5 (19.23%)10 (38.46%)3 (11.54%)2 (7.69%)      
Q4Clinical relevanceReadabilityAccessibility        
Please grade the Esperanto 2019 document according to the following criteria (scale 1 = not useful, 10 = very useful)25 (see table below*)24 (see table below*)24 (see table below*)        
Q5Clinical utilityUsabilityRange of topics        
Please grade the Esperanto 2019 templates according to the following criteria (scale 1 = not useful, 10 = very useful)24 (see table below**)24 (see table below**)24 (see table below**)        
Q6YesNoIn development        
Does your radiology department engage in clinical audit - with a programme of clinical audit in place where findings, actions and re-audits are documented?22 (51.16%)9 (20.93%)12 (27.91%)        
Q7YesNo         
Do you have a nominated department lead for clinical audit?25 (58.14%)18 (41.86%)         
Q8Administrative supportInfrastructure /IT supportClinical leadershipClinical EngagementManagerial support 
Which of the following local requirements for effective clinical audit are present in your department?YesNoYesNoYesNoYesNoYesNo 
29 (69.05%)13 (30.95%)30 (71.43%)12 (28.57%)36 (85.71%)6 (14.29%)34 (80.95%)8 (19.05%)25 (59.52%)17 (40.48%) 
Q9YesNoIn development        
Currently, does your department have a clinical audit structure in place allowing compliance with the EU-BSS?11 (25.58%)15 (34.88%)17 (39.53%)        
Q10Yes - exists, participateNo - exists, do not participateNo - does not exist        
Does your department participate in a national radiology audit programme?27 (62.79%)4 (9.30%)12 (27.91%)        
Q11National radiology societyGovernmental bodyOther national societyOther       
How is the national audit programme organised?15 (34.88%)14 (32.56%)3 (6.98%)11 (25.58%)       
Q12YesYes - but additional resources requiredNo        
In principle, would your department be prepared to participate in pan-European surveys/audits co-ordinated by the ESR/national radiology societies?11 (25.58%)20 (46.51%)12 (27.91%)        
*12345678910TOTAL
Clinical relevance1 (4.00%)0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)2 (8.00%)1 (4.00%)3 (12.00%)10 (40.00%)4 (16.00%)4 (16.00%)25
Readibility1 (4.17%)0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)5 (20.83%)11 (45.83%)6 (25.00%)1 (4.17%)24
Accessibility1 (4.17%)0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)1 (4.17%)0 (0.00%)3 (12.50%)7 (29.17%)6 (25.00%)6 (25.00%)24
**12345678910TOTAL
Clinical utility0 (0.00%)1 (4.17%)0 (0.00%)1 (4.17%)2 (8.33%)1 (4.17%)2 (8.33%)9 (37.50%)4 (16.67%)4 (16.67%)24
Usability0 (0.00%)1 (4.17%)0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)1 (4.17%)2 (8.33%)5 (20.83%)8 (33.33%)4 (16.67%)3 (12.50%)24
Range of topics0 (0.00%)1 (4.17%)1 (4.17%)1 (4.17%)1 (4.17%)1 (4.17%)6 (25.00%)6 (25.00%)6 (25.00%)1 (4.17%)24