Table 1 Feedback Survey - Radiology Departments following contact via their National Radiological Society

Q1

Yes

No

No - application in process

I don't know

Is your department a member of the ESR EuroSafe Imaging Stars network?

6 (13.95%)

28 (65.12%)

1 (2.33%)

8 (18.60%)

Q2

Yes

No

Are you familiar with the ESR publication - Esperanto 2019, the ESR Guide to Clinical Audit in Radiology and the ESR Clinical Audit Tool?

24 (55.81%)

19 (44.719%)

Q3

Word of mouth /colleagues

ECR 2019

ESR email /twitter / publication

National radiology society

Other

How did you hear about Esperanto 2019?

6 (23.08%)

5 (19.23%)

10 (38.46%)

3 (11.54%)

2 (7.69%)

Q4

Clinical relevance

Readability

Accessibility

Please grade the Esperanto 2019 document according to the following criteria (scale 1 = not useful, 10 = very useful)

25 (see table below*)

24 (see table below*)

24 (see table below*)

Q5

Clinical utility

Usability

Range of topics

Please grade the Esperanto 2019 templates according to the following criteria (scale 1 = not useful, 10 = very useful)

24 (see table below**)

24 (see table below**)

24 (see table below**)

Q6

Yes

No

In development

Does your radiology department engage in clinical audit - with a programme of clinical audit in place where findings, actions and re-audits are documented?

22 (51.16%)

9 (20.93%)

12 (27.91%)

Q7

Yes

No

Do you have a nominated department lead for clinical audit?

25 (58.14%)

18 (41.86%)

Q8

Which of the following local requirements for effective clinical audit are present in your department?

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

29 (69.05%)

13 (30.95%)

30 (71.43%)

12 (28.57%)

36 (85.71%)

6 (14.29%)

34 (80.95%)

8 (19.05%)

25 (59.52%)

17 (40.48%)

Q9

Yes

No

In development

Currently, does your department have a clinical audit structure in place allowing compliance with the EU-BSS?

11 (25.58%)

15 (34.88%)

17 (39.53%)

Q10

Yes - exists, participate

No - exists, do not participate

No - does not exist

Does your department participate in a national radiology audit programme?

27 (62.79%)

4 (9.30%)

12 (27.91%)

Q11

National radiology society

Governmental body

Other national society

Other

How is the national audit programme organised?

15 (34.88%)

14 (32.56%)

3 (6.98%)

11 (25.58%)

Q12

Yes

Yes - but additional resources required

No

In principle, would your department be prepared to participate in pan-European surveys/audits co-ordinated by the ESR/national radiology societies?

11 (25.58%)

20 (46.51%)

12 (27.91%)

*

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

TOTAL

Clinical relevance

1 (4.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

2 (8.00%)

1 (4.00%)

3 (12.00%)

10 (40.00%)

4 (16.00%)

4 (16.00%)

25

Readibility

1 (4.17%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

5 (20.83%)

11 (45.83%)

6 (25.00%)

1 (4.17%)

24

Accessibility

1 (4.17%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

1 (4.17%)

0 (0.00%)

3 (12.50%)

7 (29.17%)

6 (25.00%)

6 (25.00%)

24

**

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

TOTAL

Clinical utility

0 (0.00%)

1 (4.17%)

0 (0.00%)

1 (4.17%)

2 (8.33%)

1 (4.17%)

2 (8.33%)

9 (37.50%)

4 (16.67%)

4 (16.67%)

24

Usability

0 (0.00%)

1 (4.17%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

1 (4.17%)

2 (8.33%)

5 (20.83%)

8 (33.33%)

4 (16.67%)

3 (12.50%)

24

Range of topics

0 (0.00%)

1 (4.17%)

1 (4.17%)

1 (4.17%)

1 (4.17%)

1 (4.17%)

6 (25.00%)

6 (25.00%)

6 (25.00%)

1 (4.17%)

24