Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of AGREE II structure and detailed list of items within each domain (from reference 15)

From: A critical appraisal of the quality of adult dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry guidelines in osteoporosis using the AGREE II tool: An EuroAIM initiative

Domain 1. Scope and Purpose

 Item 1

The overall objective(s) of the guideline is (are) specifically described

 Item 2

The health question(s) covered by the guideline is (are) specifically described

 Item 3

The population (patients, public, etc.) to whom the guideline is meant to apply is specifically described

Domain 2: Stakeholder Involvement

 Item 4

The guideline development group includes individuals from all the relevant professional groups

 Item 5

The views and preferences of the target population (patients, public, etc.) have been sought

 Item 6

The target users of the guideline are clearly defined

Domain 3: Rigor of Development

 Item 7

Systematic methods were used to search for evidence

 Item 8

The criteria for selecting the evidence are clearly described

 Item 9

The strengths and limitations of the body of evidence are clearly described

 Item 10

The methods for formulating the recommendations are clearly described

 Item 11

The health benefits, side effects and risks have been considered in formulating the recommendations

 Item 12

There is an explicit link between the recommendations and the supporting evidence

 Item 13

The guideline has been externally reviewed by experts prior to its publication

 Item 14

A procedure for updating the guideline is provided

Domain 4: Clarity of Presentation

 Item 15

The recommendations are specific and unambiguous

 Item 16

The different options for management of the condition or health issue are clearly presented

 Item 17

Key recommendations are easily identifiable

Domain 5: Applicability

 Item 18

The guideline describes facilitators and barriers to its application

 Item 19

The guideline provides advice and/or tools on how the recommendations can be put into practice

 Item 20

The potential resource implications of applying the recommendations have been considered

 Item 21

The guideline presents monitoring and/or auditing criteria

Domain 6: Editorial Independence

 Item 22

The views of the funding body have not influenced the content of the guideline

 Item 23

Competing interests of guideline development group members have been recorded and addressed