Skip to main content

Table 1 A comparison of the four different radiological modalities regarding the ability to depict cystic fibrosis changes of the lungs (yes or no), as well as for cost; need for anaesthesia in young children; detail of information provided by the imaging modality; simplicity of the examination procedure; and radiation dose [6, 46, 47]. The approximate cost for each modality (derived from the price list of Skåne Regional Council, Sweden) was compared with the cost of a frontal and lateral radiograph, which was given the factor 1

From: Radiography, tomosynthesis, CT and MRI in the evaluation of pulmonary cystic fibrosis: an untangling review of the multitude of scoring systems

  

Radiography

Tomosynthesis

CT

MRI

Evaluated abnormalities:

 Lung volume

Increased lung volume

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Emphysema

No

No

Yes

No

Air trapping (expiratory images)

No

No

Yes

No

 Bronchial wall thickening

 

(Yes)a

Yes

Yes

(Yes)b

 Bronchiectasis

Mucus plugging/ radiography

(Yes)a

Yes

Yes

(Yes)b

 Mucus plugging

  

Yes

Yes

Yes

 Parenchyma

Consolidation

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Atelectasis

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Cysts/Bullae

(Yes)a

Yes

Yes

(Yes)a

Abscesses

(Yes)a

Yes

Yes

Yes

Thickened intra-/inter-lobular septa

No

No

Yes

No

Mosaic perfusion

No

No

Yes

No

Ground glass opacities

No

No

Yes

No

 Pulmonary perfusion

 

No

No

No

Yes

 Pleural affection

 

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

 Cost, compared with radiography

 

1

1.1

5.5

10.7

 Anaesthesia required for young children

 

No

Yes

(Yes)c

Yes

 Detail of information

 

Low

Medium

High

Medium

 Quick and easy to perform

 

Yes

Yes

(Yes)c

No

 Mean radiation dose (mSv)

 

0.09−0.1

0.12−0.13

7−8

0

  1. a Using radiography and MRI these changes are inferiorly discerned, compared with tomosynthesis and CT
  2. b MRI cannot differentiate between bronchial wall thickening and bronchiectasis, especially in the lung periphery [9]
  3. c Depending on the CT system used